
St. Martin's Minotaur - St. Martin's Minotaur
Release date: 2007-06-26
Hardcover
Author: Charles Finch
Mystery And Suspense Fiction, Fiction, Fiction - Mystery/ Detective, Mystery/Suspense, Fiction / Mystery & Detective / General, Fiction / Mystery & Detective / Traditional British, Mystery & Detective - Traditional British, Crimes against, England, Historical fiction, London, Private investigators, Women domestics




First in what is hopefully a continuing series featuring Charles Lennox, a Victoria gentleman, who has solved crimes that Scotland Yard seems to take credit for. Set in England 1865, Lenox is called by his next door neighbor and childhood friend Lady Jane Grey when Prudence Smith, Grey's former employee, is found dead in the home of her new employer. Things just don't add up in Jane's mind, but Charles can figure it out, he's clever that way.
Since Pru was found in the home of George Barnard, the current director of the Royal Mint, with a secret of his own; Lennox's instincts are set in high gear and a wonderful who-done-it-and-why leads the reader on a brilliant journey.
A great cast of characters that leave you smirking and curious, making this an interesting addition to the Historical Fiction genre.
But the best part -- this book seems to start in the middle of the whole Charles Lennox experience with references to the past that makes you wonder exactly where Lennox came from and where Finch is going to take him. Will more of the past be explained or will Finch just leave that up to the reader's imagination
When I pick up a relatively short novel, I virtually never leave it unread. The problem with Charles Finch's first novel was that the writing was so deeply irritating that i found myself gritting my teeth and longing for it to just be over and done with. Not the reaction I want to have while reading and not one I often have, even with writers who crank out books on a tight schedule once every 12 months.
The plot was good for the most part -- so I did skip ahead to see whodunnit. There were glaring exceptions & inconsistencies to this, some which would bother anyone (I think other reviewers have pointed out the weird age difference between Charles Lenox and Lady Jane and how that keeps changing depending on the author's needs).
But the writing... Most authors learn how to balance the information that they have about the plot and characters with what goes on the page for readers in such a way that the reader isn't overwhelmed with superfluous information and distracted from the plot. Finch hasn't mastered this basic lesson. In the middle of a murder case, he has his two principal characters sitting over a nightcap and winding down an evening by talking about the new group of debutantes. Please! That may very well be what has happened, but the reader -- hopefully in the grip of the narrative -- is yanked out of it and left bemused. Where did this come from? The story isn't about a debutante, but a maid who is poisoned. The underlying theme isn't about the role of women in Victorian society -- or if it is, the plot is far more poorly clarified than I suspected. It's irrelevant. And there is a lot more like this -- whenever Lenox meets his brother, whenever we see him musing about his suspects, etc. At best it's boring, at worst distracting and frustrating.
Complicating this is that the author has a heavy hand with dialogue. It's ponderous, to be kind. Half of it is unnecessary twaddle. And half of the descriptive passages, to avoid tedium, could or should be in expository dialogue! But then, if you can't write dialogue, I suppose you don't want to try to do that.
One quick final note -- the damn boots. Charles Lenox, our fearless protagonist and man of means, is racing around London in a pair of leaking boots, which we keep hearing leave his feet cold and uncomfortable. He can have maps and books delivered to his home. He has a butler/manservant. Why not replace the bloody boots at the first opportunity?? It's nonsensical. What could have been a nice detail on meeting the character -- traipsing home through a snowstorm with cold wet feet -- turns out to be one example where the reader ends up saying to him/herself, "this is ridiculous and implausible".
I have given the book two stars instead of one because the plot is, at its core, a relatively solid "cosy" (or "cozy!") Victorian. But if that's what you want, pick up Tasha Alexander's very good three volumes featuring her female society sleuth, and don't be seduced by the marketing into spending good money on drivel. If I sound vituperative, blame it on the fact that I own this opus in hardcover. It goes to the library tomorrow, as a donation, so if someone else really wants to struggle through it, at least they won't be facilitating the author's dreams of a longstanding career by contributing to his royalties.
I'm rarely this irritated about a book -- but then, I rarely encounter one that makes it into print that I end up really disliking. What boggles my mind is that #2 is now in print... I love the genre, there are lots of great examples of it out there -- this is not one of them.
I know there are legions of cozy fans out there. People who wish Agatha Christie was still alive and writing about bodies in libraries and genteel aristocrats poisoning their mistresses. I'm not one of them. So for all you kids out there in mysteryland who have been longing for a real cozy with lots of tea drinking, a gentleman sleuth with a personal valet who owes his employer his life (shades of Bunter and Lord Peter Wimsey, eh?), and a utterly fictional poison that doubles as an orchid fertilizer (HELP!) -- then this is for you. I grew weary of it after 75 pages or so and skipped to the end. The denouement is utterly boring. Then the book drags on for another couple of chapters dealing with the relationship with the sleuth and his lady - a relationship I found dull from the first time they were together. The book is overloaded with a kind of quaintness I find as fake as a zirconium diamond. It's a thoroughly fraudulent work - peopled with a cast of characters who are amalgams of Victorian types from works already written, and it borrows heavily (whether or conscious or not) from the the great writers of the genre's past (Sayers, Christie and Doyle, especially). The constant tea drinking and the ersatz Victorian dialogue ("I most certainly shall, my dear." etc., etc.) drove my bonkers. I'm glad to be rid of it.