
MGM (Video & DVD) - MGM (Video & DVD)
Release date: 2008-04-08
DVD
Director:Steven Sawalich
Actors: Rebecca De Mornay, Hector Elizondo, Ron Livingston, Yul Vázquez, Michael Sheen
Adult Situations, Biopic [feature], Bittersweet, Color, Confrontational, Drama, Drug Content, English, Feature, Feature Film-drama, Heartwarming, Home From the War, Inspirational Drama, Journey of Self-Discovery, Living With Disability, Movie, Poignant, Profanity, Rousing, Stirring




What an amazing, enjoyable movie. It's a small film, with a wonderful message - don't see the handicap, just see people.
This movie reminded me of a comment I heard on Canadian radio, there is this whole myth that we were somehow much more polite and had manners in the 60's, 50's and earlier. But those wonderfully mannered polite people mistreated people who were different, race, gender, ability, and age. Those polite people enacted an "ugly law." There's nothing polite or proper about all that. Today we may be rude to eachother with cell phones, and imperfect manners - but nobody today would even think of an "ugly law." You see a very similar message in "Mad Men," the television drama about 1950's Madison Avenue advertising men, and their treament of women.
I loved the message of this film. I bought the characters, every one of them. I am very happy I spent an hour and a half with this film.
Although this film does have some faults. It loses steam just after Richard comes back from Viet Nam. There's some missteps very near the end with Christine, where the film loses it's way. But over all, a totally enjoyable film, with some minor flaws.
By the way, having the subtitles on, is actually a big help with this film.
I've had the privilege of meeting Mr. Pimentel and hearing him tell his own story with great humor, energy, self-deprecation and panache. They say that people are put into each others lives for a purpose. Thus, Art and Richard were the spark that ignited the original Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, offering accommodations in public buildings and the workplace to those for whom opportunity had previously been abysmally absent.
Over time, the Supreme Court and appointed EEOC regulators, emasculated the purpose of the act by too narrowly drawing the definition of disability. In many circumstances, merely taking prescribed medication, regardless of its effectiveness, would be sufficient mitigation to deny the existence of disability. Episodic or relapsing-remitting conditions (such as, seizure disorders or MS) would not be considered disabling because of their lack of constancy, despite their unpredictability. And those simply 'perceived' to have had some illness and then not hired, could not claim they were discriminated against.
But, Richard Pimentel again returned to the drawing board and in September of this year, the ADA Amendments Act of 2008 was signed into law. It goes into effect 1/1/09, clarifying the 'Broad' definition of Disabilities, the reassertion of rationality into the decision making process regarding mitigation, episodic conditions, body systems, activities of daily living and communication. In essence, the intent of the ADA has been resurrected. And, hopefully for all the Richards and Arts of this country, those who seek the old fashioned 'outright intentional exclusion' will have had their last hurrah.